[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: On the nature of a Idea

#### Message 01495 of 3835

- To: <BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [BardonPraxis] On the nature of a Idea
- From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:34:25 -0700
- References: <20030917195437.80151.qmail@...>

    Dear Eric and Chuck,

    Chuck wrote:
    >> There is a distinct chance that Rawn will type an answer to you, but
    I wanted to jump in and give a few thoughts on this topic. I've thought
    a lot about it too. <<

    :) After your reply, there's no need for me to reply! That was an
    excellent presentation.

    The only thing I would add is to recommend that you, Eric, search the
    BardonPraxis archives for a series of posts about the "direct perception
    of essential meaning". Much of that discussion can also be found on my
    website by going to
    http://www.ABardonCompanion.com/Essays&CorrespLinks.html

    My best to you,
    :) Rawn Clark
    18 Sept 2003
    rawnclark@...
    rawn@...
    http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
    http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: On the nature of a Idea
    - From: Eric Meridiano <ericmeridiano@...>

- References:
  - On the nature of a Idea
    - From: Eric Meridiano <ericmeridiano@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: general synesthetic question
- Next by Date: Earthing
- Previous by thread: Re: On the nature of a Idea
- Next by thread: Re: On the nature of a Idea
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index