[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering

#### Message 01209 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
- From: "peter_reist" <peter_reist@...>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 21:01:55 -0000
- In-reply-to: <005801c3590e$464ecf10$b0a37fd8@ownerbqacdlzy6>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear Rawn,

    Thank you for the link. While I have read that article before, it
    seems to have gained new depth since my work with KTQ and my
    advancement within IIH. From what I understand from that article, the
    work of PME is quite akin to that of KTQ in that one has to learn how
    to integrate the energies of the universal principles into the self
    and down to everyday existence. The work of mentally wandering to a
    sphere forces the scholar to integrate the quality of that sphere
    into their mental body via the impregination of the mental body with
    the light quality of that sphere. This integrates work integrates the
    grosser aspects of that sphere into the mental body, whereas actual
    contact with an individual spirit causes an interaction of a more
    subtler, specific quality of that sphere with the energies of the
    mental body. A work which naturally leads to those aspects of the
    universal principles working their way through the layers of
    existence to manifest in physicality.

    This is the same sort of work that occurs within KTQ where one
    invokes specific qualities within the self in the form of the Letters
    as colour, tone, feeling and legality within the whole body, the
    elemental regions and the specific organs. Each exercise of invoking
    the Letters subtly changing the structure of the three bodies to
    become more in accord with the universal principles. The invoking of
    the letter with the transfer of consciousness to a specific organ or
    elemental region finalizing the transformation of that specific pole
    of the quadrapolar magnet. What Bardon doesn't seem to talk about
    within KTQ is that there are two ways of invoking the letter into a
    specific organ or elemental region: one would be letting ones
    consciousness enliven the whole organ or elemental region, whereas
    the other would be to transfer one's consciousness to the depth point
    of that organ and invoking the letter with the unified, three bodies
    of that organ alone. Both workings transform and integrate the
    universal qualities within the self, though I find that the latter
    form seems to transform and integrate these universal principles
    moreso than the other. I remember when I first invoked the letter 'A'
    into my lungs via the depth point. After dismissing the letter from
    my lungs they felt so strange that I kept on poking my lungs with my
    consciousness going, "Are those my lungs? That doesn't feel like my
    lungs. I don't remember my lungs feeling like that before." And,
    after a little bit of meditation upon the matter I began to see how
    this work had changed the structure of the mental and astral materia
    and the structure of the mental and astral matrixs subtly to better
    express the universal quality of that letter within myself. Though I
    don't quite understand the specifics of this transformation, I know
    that it feels proper.

    What I don't quite understand is how the condensation of a specific
    quality of light within the magical triangle into an astral density,
    and the evocation of a spirit into that atmosphere furthers that
    progression of the subtle mental energies manifesting themselves
    within physicality. Especially since, when doing as such, one is
    seperated from the spirit that is evoked by both the magical circle
    and the magical triangle.

    Love and Live well,
    Peter Reist

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
    - From: "parzifal418" <parzifal418@...>
  - Re: Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- References:
  - Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
- Next by Date: Idea for the Bardon Questionnaire
- Previous by thread: Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
- Next by thread: Re: Formal Evocation vs. Mental Wandering
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index