[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Re: questions . . .

#### Message 01152 of 3835

- To: <BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [BardonPraxis] Re: questions . . .
- From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 21:05:06 -0700
- References: <bfhrt1+9209@eGroups.com>

    Dear Peter,

    >> 'T' on the other hand, deals mostly with the perception of analogies
    and that ability to manipulate the materia that those analogies are
    connected to. <<

    Plus, it takes love in one's heart to master the manipulation of those
    analogies and, thereby, the materia connected to them.

    >> Both can essentially accomplish the same thing, just in slightly
    different fashions. <<

    Bardon's 'T' and 'J' are closely related in that they are both linguals.

    His 'J' is equivalent to the Hebrew 'Tav' or sharp 'Th' consonant. If
    you try pronouncing these, one after the other, you'll see how they are
    hidden in the same place in the mouth and in the same way. The 'Tav'
    (pronounced properly) ignites the same dark opalescence that Bardon
    described for the 'J'.

    It is the 'Tav' materia, within which the analogies exist, that one
    makes use of in mummial magic. But it's the cognizance of these
    analogies that empowers mummial magic and this is why I would attribute
    it to 'Teth' instead of 'Tav'.

    My best to you,
    :) Rawn Clark
    21 Jul 2003
    rawnclark@...
    rawn@...
    http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
    http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: questions . . .
    - From: "shadowdancers97420" <shadowdancers@...>

- References:
  - Re: questions . . .
    - From: "peter_reist" <peter_reist@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Continued Vacancy
- Next by Date: Re: questions . . .
- Previous by thread: Re: questions . . .
- Next by thread: Re: questions . . .
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index