[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re:Essential meaning

#### Message 00817 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re:Essential meaning
- From: "peter_reist" <peter_reist@...>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 15:12:43 -0000
- In-reply-to: <001501c32179$eeea2e70$25a37fd8@ownerbqacdlzy6>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear Scott,

    >From my experiences with essential meaning, when one percieves
    essential meaning, there is no real *core* to is as there where.
    Essential meaning reflects the totality of the thing that is being
    percieved. As such, you have the perception of dimension, colour,
    history, and so forth permeating that essential meaning. In other
    words, essential meaning seems to consist of a near infinite set of
    datum that, when it is percieved as a whole, can only be done so
    intuitivly with the right side of the brain.

    What Rawn calls a voice or a personality of essential meaning, is
    more akin to a finite set of datum that is taken from the totality of
    essential meaning. Generally speaking, this *voice* is something that
    is percieved logically with the left side of the brain. Moreover,
    there are a number of voices that can be derived from essential
    meaning. Some of which speak louder than others.

    Love and Live well,
    Peter Reist

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Re:Essential meaning
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- References:
  - Re: Re:Essential meaning
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Re:Essential meaning
- Next by Date: a new member
- Previous by thread: Re: Re:Essential meaning
- Next by thread: Re: Re:Essential meaning
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index