[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Re: Step 2 -- counting cord

#### Message 00247 of 3835

- To: <BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [BardonPraxis] Re: Step 2 -- counting cord
- From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:55:39 -0800
- References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030119095402.00ac1ca0@...>

    Dear Amberlyn,

    >> <g> Do you read minds, Rawn? You responded to the part of my post
    that I had *deleted* ! I usually *do* use the number 36 <smile>: <<

    ;-) ;-) ;-) No, nothing that mysterious in this case. Knowing you as
    I do, I just put three and three together, that's all. ;-) I asked
    myself, "What number between 30 and 40 would be the most significant to
    Amberlyn?" It was an easy *deduction*.

    My best to you,
    :) Rawn Clark
    19 Jan 2003
    rawnclark@...
    rawn@...
    http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis

- References:
  - Re: Step 2 -- counting cord
    - From: Amberlyn <amberlyn@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Do i have to start it all over again?
- Next by Date: the value (ha!) of elemental assignments
- Previous by thread: Re: Step 2 -- counting cord
- Next by thread: Simultaneous studies
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index