[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Is this right? - general alchemistical process !?

#### Message 03787 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Is this right? - general alchemistical process !?
- From: "Patrik" <patwe77@...>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:01:42 -0000
- In-reply-to: <d4bigd+shif@eGroups.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear Joel, Dear all

    "The counterpart of a characteristic being in the counterpart
    element?"
    This is a very good question ... !! Thank you for asking.

    Sometimes, I think *both* could be true!?
    Fear is transformed through confidence, and this may manifest
    as "primeval trust", like feeling one and protected within ocean,
    manifesting thereby as courage and commitment in Fire elemental terms
    as well, so that love and courage (might) belong or effect each other
    somehow together (seeing the movie "Spirit" as symbolic demonstration
    for this), but I do not yet know *how* it works exactly.
    Depression might be initially solved through self-love (water), thus
    opening the door for inspiration, joy and enthuisiasm in the
    counterpart element (just waiting to spread out from within); instead
    of trying to transform depression into enthusiasm directly by
    external ideas. Many psychologists reject "positive thinking"
    *because* of such a kind of counterpart transformation attempts.

    The other way, anger not just resolved by taming into softness and
    sweetness, but by transforming it into creativ, powerful positive
    used energy (within fire itself) and developing more patience,
    stillness (water), too ...

    It seems possible that a rather negative Element must be purified
    *within itself* and at same time balanced by strengthening the
    *counterpart* element.

    Maybe anyone can clarify this? Or has this question already being
    answered in the past?

    I assume, although elemental questions may be different for different
    individuals, there must still be a kind of precious general
    alchemistical lawfulness, concerning the counterpart question.

    Patrik

- References:
  - Is this right?
    - From: "Joel Lerner Amato" <superjoel11@...>

- Prev by Date: Is this right?
- Next by Date: Re: first mental exercises - emotional tone?
- Previous by thread: Is this right?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this right?
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index