[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: a question about the eucharist

#### Message 03584 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: a question about the eucharist
- From: "hermetics10" <hermetics10@...>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:31:38 -0000
- In-reply-to: <cujphu+1jtu@eGroups.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Fater QV,

    Thank you for your help.

    beginner

    --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "draco_io" <Draco_io@h...>
    wrote:
    >
    > Dear 'beginner',
    >
    > Bardon never really gave a good definition of what "akasha" is.
    > There are several different meanings depending on which
    > mystical/magical school you are talking about. If anyone can
    quote
    > Bardon's comments/definition on "akasha," I would really love to
    hear
    > it.
    >
    > In any case, in step one, it's virtually unimportant what might be
    > meant by the esoteric meaning of "akasha." Simply do the
    exercises
    > to the best of you're ability and don't worry about it. Practice
    the
    > material for 3 months and move on. Frankly, by the time you can
    > literally reach a state of "emptiness of mind," you will be
    > fully "enlightened" ( as in the sense of nirvikalpa Samadhi--and
    that
    > will take years, if not decades). That's not required for step
    one,
    > simply control the most topical thoughts. However, with practice,
    you
    > will find that you are far more than the body-mind matrix you've
    > always thought you were. That's enough for step one.
    >
    > I would go farther and suggest that even if you don't feel you've
    > mastered the material ( with the exception of the soul mirrors)
    move
    > on after 3 months.
    >
    > Transferring an idea into food is purely an imaginary process. The
    > main significance is to get a person to:
    > 1. develop their imaginary abilities.
    > 2. Learn to absorb or ingest their own mental constructs rather
    than
    > the nonsense that's thrown at them from the outside world.
    > 3. Hopefully, begin the process of unifying a person with their
    own
    > soul.
    >
    > If you can do that and maintain a relative attunement to your own
    > soul, move on to step two. Anything else would be a waste of time.
    >
    > Shanti,
    >
    > Fater QV
    >
    >
    >
    > --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...>
    > wrote:
    > > Dear 'beginner',
    > >
    > > >> Could you please give an expample of the thought process of
    > > transfering the the idea into the food? <<
    > >
    > > I suggest that you begin experimenting! :) Try out a variety of
    > > methods and find the one that works best for *you*. What works
    > best for
    > > *me* is not any sort of "transferring" of the ideation,
    > nor "projection"
    > > of it into the substance, etc. Instead, it is a matter of simply
    > > *knowing* without a doubt that the Akasha within the substance
    has
    > > absorbed my ideation. In fact, I will build the strength of my
    > ideation
    > > directly *within* the substance itself. In other words, I focus
    my
    > > thoughts upon the substance and build my ideation within the
    > substance,
    > > all the while *knowing* that the Akasha within the substance is
    > greedily
    > > soaking up my ideation.
    > >
    > > My best to you,
    > > :) Rawn Clark
    > > 06 Feb 2005
    > > rawnclark@n...
    > > rawn@a...
    > > http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
    > > http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe

- References:
  - Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "draco_io" <Draco_io@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: desire in hermeticism
- Next by Date: Re: Re: desire in hermeticism
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Next by thread: Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index