[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Question One-pointedness

#### Message 00377 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Question One-pointedness
- From: "Richard Be X Born <ribex@...>" <ribex@...>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:59:09 -0000
- In-reply-to: <001d01c2c87a$ecb20450$b9a17fd8@ownerbqacdlzy6>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear Rawn ~

    > Sounds good to me but I think the more important question is, did it
    > work for *you*? That's really the final test.

    It worked for me in the regard that it kept my mind firmly focused
    upon the topic at hand. By keeping the mental "words" going even when
    there was no real content, I kept the topic in mind and shut out all
    other thoughts, until I could continue building upon the topic
    content-wise.

    The question is, again, if this means of keeping focused is conducive
    to the purpose of the exercise, or if I instead am cheating by
    forcing my line of thinking in this way. What I in essence am doing
    here to keep out distractions is making sure they cannot bypass my
    wall of mental noise repeating the topic, until I find content to
    actively pursue it again.

    Could not this be likened to having a loud monotonous noise on, such
    as an air-conditioner, to drown out otherwise audible distractions?

    Well met and thank you for your responses!
    Vovin

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Re: Question One-pointedness
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
  - Re: Question One-pointedness
    - From: "severian4 <ab@...>" <ab@...>

- References:
  - Re: Question One-pointedness
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- Prev by Date: One-pointedness success
- Next by Date: Re: mad
- Previous by thread: Re: Question One-pointedness
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Question One-pointedness
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index