[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: a question about the eucharist

#### Message 03579 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: a question about the eucharist
- From: "draco_io" <Draco_io@...>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:27:10 -0000
- In-reply-to: <009801c50c79$a0d336e0$79b53542@ownerbqacdlzy6>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear 'beginner',

    Bardon never really gave a good definition of what "akasha" is.
    There are several different meanings depending on which
    mystical/magical school you are talking about. If anyone can quote
    Bardon's comments/definition on "akasha," I would really love to hear
    it.

    In any case, in step one, it's virtually unimportant what might be
    meant by the esoteric meaning of "akasha." Simply do the exercises
    to the best of you're ability and don't worry about it. Practice the
    material for 3 months and move on. Frankly, by the time you can
    literally reach a state of "emptiness of mind," you will be
    fully "enlightened" ( as in the sense of nirvikalpa Samadhi--and that
    will take years, if not decades). That's not required for step one,
    simply control the most topical thoughts. However, with practice, you
    will find that you are far more than the body-mind matrix you've
    always thought you were. That's enough for step one.

    I would go farther and suggest that even if you don't feel you've
    mastered the material ( with the exception of the soul mirrors) move
    on after 3 months.

    Transferring an idea into food is purely an imaginary process. The
    main significance is to get a person to:
    1. develop their imaginary abilities.
    2. Learn to absorb or ingest their own mental constructs rather than
    the nonsense that's thrown at them from the outside world.
    3. Hopefully, begin the process of unifying a person with their own
    soul.

    If you can do that and maintain a relative attunement to your own
    soul, move on to step two. Anything else would be a waste of time.

    Shanti,

    Fater QV

    --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@n...>
    wrote:
    > Dear 'beginner',
    >
    > >> Could you please give an expample of the thought process of
    > transfering the the idea into the food? <<
    >
    > I suggest that you begin experimenting! :) Try out a variety of
    > methods and find the one that works best for *you*. What works
    best for
    > *me* is not any sort of "transferring" of the ideation,
    nor "projection"
    > of it into the substance, etc. Instead, it is a matter of simply
    > *knowing* without a doubt that the Akasha within the substance has
    > absorbed my ideation. In fact, I will build the strength of my
    ideation
    > directly *within* the substance itself. In other words, I focus my
    > thoughts upon the substance and build my ideation within the
    substance,
    > all the while *knowing* that the Akasha within the substance is
    greedily
    > soaking up my ideation.
    >
    > My best to you,
    > :) Rawn Clark
    > 06 Feb 2005
    > rawnclark@n...
    > rawn@a...
    > http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
    > http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
  - Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "hermetics10" <hermetics10@...>
  - Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: Stu <vuynoy@...>

- References:
  - Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: desire in hermeticism
- Next by Date: Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Previous by thread: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Next by thread: Re: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index