[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Re: Does Water give form to Fire ? - complement to my question

#### Message 01610 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [BardonPraxis] Re: Does Water give form to Fire ? - complement to my question
- From: Newbieonekenhobby <newbieonekenhobby@...>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <bn6ip8+62u7@eGroups.com>

    Dear Alan,
    Many thanks for your advice.
    NB

    In fact, I'm not
    --- Alan <fish_studios@...> wrote:
    > Dear NB,
    >
    > >> Taking this literally, meaning that the creation
    > deriving from the Electric force takes actual shape
    > through the
    > influence of the magnetic Fluid, is it possible to
    > infer that Water
    > gives form to Fire ?
    >
    > a) Superficially this looked obvious to me given the
    > attributes of
    > the respective Elements. But suddenly I was not sure
    > this was "licit".
    >
    > b) Since *Water* somewhat looks like an
    > instantiation of the
    > *Magnetic* Fluid or its concrete manifestation
    > (sorry - I don't find
    > the words), and the equivalent for Fire, the
    > deduction seems logical
    > from that angle also At the same time, since they
    > are not at the same
    > level, and given the explicit additional attributes
    > of Water and
    > Fire, I was not sure this was authorized. <<
    >
    > Although this will not answer your question, it's
    > some advice. At
    > some point, you have to let go and jump in. In
    > other words, the only
    > way to truly understand something is to experience
    > it. Theoretical
    > knowledge can only give you so much understanding,
    > if really any at
    > all. So in order to truly understand the elements,
    > you really have
    > to experience them. The way that the elements
    > interact cannot really
    > be expressed in words, I suppose that is why it is
    > attributed to the
    > occult, if you could understand it simply
    > conceptually, then it would
    > be widely accepted. But it cannot.
    >
    > >> What is correct ? Or am I "pedaling besides the
    > bicycle" :-) ? Or
    > should I wait till level 8 :-( ? <<
    >
    > Fortunately, you do not need to wait till Step 8.
    > You being to
    > directly work with the elements in Step 3, which
    > helps to understand
    > them better, and at completion of Step 6, you will
    > have mastered the
    > elements, so before then (hopefully) you should have
    > a full
    > understanding of the elements and their interaction.
    >
    > Like I said, not a real answer, but something to
    > think about. I
    > would answer your question, but I myself have not
    > mastered them so I
    > cannot in good conscience try to ;)
    >
    > All Will Go Well,
    > --Alan
    >
    >
    > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > BardonPraxis-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
    http://shopping.yahoo.com

- References:
  - Re: Does Water give form to Fire ? - complement to my question
    - From: "Alan" <fish_studios@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Does Water give form to Fire ? - complement to my question
- Next by Date: telekinesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Does Water give form to Fire ? - complement to my question
- Next by thread: RE: Does Water give form to Fire ?
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index