[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# RE: Manifestation

#### Message 00644 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: RE: [BardonPraxis] Manifestation
- From: Andrew Llewellyn <andrew@...>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:56:04 +0100
- In-reply-to: <006401c2ffec$76b2cfb0$6501a8c0@odin>
- References: <b74p5a+34lu@eGroups.com>

    My friend, from what I have read you *always* have a useful reply.

    Andy

    At 23:37 10/04/03 -0600, you wrote:

    >Hi,
    >
    >Some thoughts on manifestation...
    >
    >It's a weird thing about Bardon. I've found myself, in the past, going
    >off on tangents to Bardon and exploring all sorts of sundry techniques
    >and more immediately seductive byways of magic and enchantment. And,
    >after these long loops, I find myself back to discover the essence of my
    >new experience was actually distilled in some form or another in
    >Bardon's IIH. The reason I didn't seen it, at first, was that in his
    >written form it is sometimes difficult to pick out where the emphasis
    >should be. Or he will mention something seemingly in passing that is a
    >critical distinction in the effectiveness of a technique or practice.
    >Some of these distinctions, especially for manifestation, are packed
    >into the first two steps.
    >
    >The model of magical manifestation, as I work with it to date, deals
    >with bringing a form down through 4 layers into the physical. The
    >shifting from one layer to the next needs to be smooth an integral... a
    >martial arts example is "punching with your feet." Force is transmitted
    >through the linking your entire body into one fluid and coordinated
    >movement.
    >
    >In manifestation, I believe this movement must start *well* in the
    >mental. This can mean a couple of things.
    >
    >1. Clear outcome. You have to know what it is, specifically, that you
    >want so your intent is not ambiguous or ill-defined. If you can't see
    >this clearly in your imagination you cannot coalesce a structure for the
    >energy to manifest materially.
    >2. Your thought-form needs to be strong, not a nebulous wish. Strong has
    >some very quantitative measures. For example... you should be able to
    >hold this intent for at least 17 seconds for it to have the slimmest
    >chance of making it any further than just a random thread which is the
    >typical nature of most everyday thinking. Strength also pertains to how
    >vivid you can make this thought form.
    >
    >Once you have a finely honed thought-form, which is actually the
    >building blocks of exercises in step 1 and 2 you need to link it to
    >energy. Energy as a property of the astral and the emotions -vs- the
    >mental plane.
    >
    >Here it's easy to make a mistake, even if you created the thought-form
    >impeccably and have collected the typically nebulous, diffused energy of
    >the tick-tock mind into a focused, compact intent of magical volition.
    >
    >There's a tendency for us to think "about" something or to think "of"
    >something -vs- a more powerful way of forming this directional energy on
    >the astral, Neville captures this distinction in his excellent book
    >"Awakened Imagination" as follows:
    >
    >"...we must use imagination masterfully, not as an onlooker thinking
    >*of* the end, but as a partaker thinking *from* the end. We must
    >actually *be* there in imagination. If we do this, our subjective
    >experience will be realized objectively."
    >
    >Of course, this is stated in Bardon more succinctly with his advice to
    >use impregnation as-if you already contained the quality you seek.
    >
    >The key is to invoke this energy with the feeling of you already having
    >accomplished your goal and experiencing now how it will feel "then." You
    >may often discover, in this step, that it is not really or exactly what
    >you wanted, and you'll need to go back to work again on clarifying your
    >intent. This usually indicates parts of yourself that are not aligned
    >with your goal and that would have ultimately sabotaged your intent.
    >
    >I believe this also utilizes the law of attraction and the natural
    >magnetism of the astral plane to pull this manifestation toward you even
    >more powerfully.
    >
    >The next plane you navigate with your crystal clear intent, cloaked with
    >its energetic sheath is also in Bardon, but it is not explicit. It is
    >something you may discover through working the exercises diligently.
    >
    >Through the observation of thoughts, localizing pore breathing and
    >transplanting consciousness, you might come to discover our experiences
    >are encoded in our energetic forms, or the etheric layer. You can also
    >find this through studying Reich or NLP to see it more clearly in
    >Bardon. For example, if you've been observing your thoughts closely,
    >you'll note that the way you think about things that have happened is
    >subtly different from thoughts about things that are going to happen or
    >that have never happened. Most people "represent" these thoughts
    >spatially. When they think of what they ate yesterday, they may note the
    >thought is behind them or to the left. As the events recede further and
    >further into the past they are placed further behind or to the left.
    >When they think of something they know they will be doing tomorrow, it
    >may be close and in front or slightly off to the right. In other
    >disciplines this is called your "timeline."
    >
    >Using this encoding you can now "place" your energized thought-form in
    >your future energetically, rather than just letting it float as some
    >anomalous blob in a space disconnected with your events. You can also
    >play with other encodings, like where you place things you believe -vs-
    >things you doubt. But the timeline is sufficient alone for this
    >experiment.
    >
    >Finally, you'll want some linkage in the material plane. This can be as
    >simple as saying "So mote it be" out loud or writing an affirmation or
    >it could be a ritual or spell that you enact as you unfold the process
    >above. Based on the correlations in the spell or helpful magical
    >implements, this can pull in more sympathetic resonances to enhance the
    >intent. But the ritual alone cannot make up for the missing elements in
    >the core of the practice above.
    >
    >So these are some thoughts on the subject, hopefully there will be
    >something of use in this long-winded reply.
    >
    >-emc

    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

- References:
  - Manifestation
    - From: "persephone393" <persephone393@...>
  - RE: Manifestation
    - From: 4i81-adq1@...

- Prev by Date: RE: Manifestation
- Next by Date: Re: Manifestation
- Previous by thread: RE: Manifestation
- Next by thread: Re: Manifestation
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index