[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Step V - a few questions (cont)

#### Message 02985 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Step V - a few questions (cont)
- From: "votangreen" <votangreen@...>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:03 -0000
- In-reply-to: <B706E9BAD2D4674286317AFB4ADD1CF7824738@...>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    First of all I am glad that were having this discussion.
    Second I am in complete understanding of Ravns comment about
    creation an unbalance by persuing the possible instead of continuing
    with the sufficient.
    The issue here was if it was an actual requirement for proceeding to
    step 6 or not. And my personal curiosity about the degree of
    students who passed step 5 who was able to do that kind of
    manifestations.

    A question for Rawn: you say that the visualisation of an object in
    step 2 hasn´t got to be as clear as if it was physical? What degree
    is sufficient then? I been having a slight problem as well since my
    respective eyes tends to view the object separately. Different
    angles etc..strange experience. I suppose it it just to keep going
    until i got a good binocular picture I guess.

    respectfully
    //Johannes

    --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Scott" <rscott@p...>
    wrote:
    > Dear Rawn
    >
    > RE: Step V - a few questions (cont)
    >
    >

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Re: Step V - a few questions (cont)
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- References:
  - RE: RE: Step V - a few questions (cont)
    - From: "Richard Scott" <rscott@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Reasons for evoking a particular spirit
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Step V - a few questions (cont)
- Previous by thread: Re: RE: Step V - a few questions (cont)
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Step V - a few questions (cont)
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index