[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: small question

#### Message 03001 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: small question
- From: "loumade_1999" <loumade_1999@...>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:02:52 -0000
- In-reply-to: <20040830132233.21792.qmail@...>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Peter,

    My edition says that "...[it]...cannot be accumulated in same
    way..." Am I reading too much into this or is the translation of my
    older edition leading to the ambiguity. My mind just figured that if
    there was a way that was the "SAME" there must be a way that
    is "DIFFERENT."

    Thanks for your prompt reply

    ~Louis

    --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Reist" <preist@g...>
    wrote:
    >
    > Luis,
    >
    > I suggest you re-read what Bardon talks about in step five and
    > six. He specifically states that the akasha can *not* be
    > accumulated.
    >
    > Love and Live well,
    > Peter Reist
    >
    > loumade_1999 writes:
    >
    > > What would the problems be if there was an over accumulation of
    > > Akasha? Would General dissociation be the result? (not the kind
    of
    > > dissociation where you don't feel anything) Is this totally a
    bad
    > > thing if paranoia could be avoided? Is dissociation just letting
    the
    > > mind wander around the "spheres"???
    > >
    > > All comments would be greatly appreciated.
    > > Louis

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Re: small question
    - From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>

- References:
  - Re: small question
    - From: "Peter Reist" <preist@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: about thought control
- Next by Date: Re: Re: small question
- Previous by thread: Re: small question
- Next by thread: Re: Re: small question
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index