[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: [BardonPraxis] Darwin's theory of evolution and Big Bang theory

#### Message 01149 of 3835

- To: <BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [BardonPraxis] Darwin's theory of evolution and Big Bang theory
- From: "Rawn Clark" <rawnclark@...>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:34:57 -0700
- References: <20030721163418.19056.qmail@...>

    Dear Roeme,

    >> The following statement on page 174 of ' A Bardon Companion' states
    that " Much time and intellect has been wasted trying to specify which
    part of the original creation occurred first, second, third, etc.". Are
    you referring to Darwin's theory of evolution and Big Bang theory by the
    scientists? <<

    No, not at all. I'm referring to religious dogmatists who have written
    volumes upon volumes of theories about the sequence of the "original"
    Creation. If you look at the context of that statement, you'll see that
    I'm discussing the eternal, non-sequential nature of The Creation and
    saying that one must be cautious in thinking of it in terms that imply
    sequence.

    Darwin's and the Big Bang theories both concern only a small drop of
    water in the temporal ocean of The Creation. They do not deal with The
    Creation itself.

    My best to you,
    :) Rawn Clark
    21 Jul 2003
    rawnclark@...
    rawn@...
    http://www.ABardonCompanion.com
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BardonPraxis
    http://E.webring.com/hub?ring=arionthebardonwe

- References:
  - Darwin’s theory of evolution and Big Bang theory
    - From: Roem Ratnam <roem03@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Do I Have Too?:)
- Next by Date: Re: beauty only for wemen?
- Previous by thread: Darwin’s theory of evolution and Big Bang theory
- Next by thread: late introduction
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index