[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Main Index][Thread Index]

# Re: a question about the eucharist

#### Message 03573 of 3835

- To: BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: a question about the eucharist
- From: "hermetics10" <hermetics10@...>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:28:22 -0000
- In-reply-to: <cu6o59+s87t@eGroups.com>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

    Dear emc,

    Thank you for your clarifying explanation.

    beginner

    --- In BardonPraxis@yahoogroups.com, "emcshadow" <emcshadow@x> wrote:
    >
    >
    > In addition to the excellent suggestions so far, this may help.
    >
    > It may be useful to think of thought-forms, in this case your
    > 'ideations', as energetic constructs rather than intellectual
    ones.
    >
    > It is difficult for the modern mind to conceptually bridge the
    > descartian divide and push an intellectual construct into some
    > material mass no? Part of this exercise is retraining this
    erroneous
    > conditioning and realizing the rich energetic connections that
    abound
    > in a superficially material world. You may have experienced this
    > linkage when you think of a friend the same time the phone rings
    with
    > their call. Or felt someone looking at you from across the room.
    Your
    > thought-forms are energetically interacting with your reality both
    > within and without constantly. Usually without awareness or intent.
    >
    > And in addition to this shift of perception of internal thought-
    forms
    > as energetic constructs, also break down the eucharist into an
    > energetic matrix. Trace the food, for example, back to the plant
    forms
    > and elemental energies, the sun, water, air and earth that are
    part of
    > the timestream of its existence and consider the alchemical
    processes
    > at work absorbing this into your body and the way the energy is
    being
    > processed, transfered and transmuted during this interaction. Then
    the
    > coupling may feel more natural, as indeed it is. When you start
    > feeling this connection as a fabric rather than an artificial
    > dichotomy between subject and object, you've started to reprogram
    your
    > reality in some very interesting and useful ways.
    >
    > -emc

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "emcshadow" <emcshadow@...>

- References:
  - Re: a question about the eucharist
    - From: "emcshadow" <emcshadow@...>

- Prev by Date: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Next by Date: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Previous by thread: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Next by thread: Re: a question about the eucharist
- Indexes:
  - Main
  - Thread

Main Index | Thread Index